Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
6/7/2025, 6:13:10 PM
X
In reply to:
Jason Baird
@jm_baird
·
201d
@GaryMarcus I hate that I've become one of those older guys pining away for the "good old days", but I really do miss the '80s and '90s when thoughts like this were mainstream. https://x.com/jm_baird/status/19…
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
201d
Most of this could have been written after ELIZA, in 1965.

ELIZA wasn’t conscious, and nor is ChatGPT.

ELIZA’s apparent emotions were an illusion of mimicking human language; so are ChatGPT’s.

My guess: the subtext to all this is that AI-induced delusion is becoming a
Joanne Jang
@joannejang
·
203d
some thoughts on human-ai relationships and how we're approaching them at openai

it's a long blog post --

tl;dr we build models to serve people first. as more people feel increasingly connected to ai, we’re prioritizing research into how this impacts their emotional well-being.

The conversation involves a discussion on AI consciousness and its impact on human emotions, referencing historical perspectives and current AI developments. The tone is reflective and analytical, engaging with the implications of AI-human relationships.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and engages in a thoughtful discussion about AI's impact on society. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes understanding by exploring the emotional connections people form with AI and the importance of prioritizing emotional well-being. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is constructive, engaging with differing perspectives on AI consciousness and its societal implications without personal attacks. [+1]