Michael Schellenberger

The statement uses sarcasm to criticize the perceived lack of police presence during a chaotic situation in Los Angeles. It targets public figures, implying their responsibility for the situation. The tone is mocking and dismissive, which may not contribute to constructive dialogue.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The sarcastic tone may exacerbate tensions rather than promote peace. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment but could be seen as disrespectful to public figures. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on criticism rather than solutions. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement uses sarcasm instead of constructive criticism, which may hinder productive dialogue. [-1]