Michael Schellenberger

The statement critiques California and Democratic politicians for not deploying the National Guard amid escalating protests and violence. It implies a failure in leadership and decision-making during a crisis.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as exacerbating tensions by criticizing leaders during a volatile situation, potentially doing harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech but could be seen as undermining the dignity of those criticized. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or offer solutions, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]