Michael Schellenberger

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by addressing the issue of police presence and public safety during protests in Los Angeles. The conversation critiques the response of local and national authorities, highlighting a perceived lack of intervention and questioning the adequacy of police resources.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses a sarcastic tone, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially exacerbating tensions. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the tone could be seen as dismissive of the challenges faced by authorities.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The sarcastic tone does not promote empathy or compassion, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement critiques public figures and policies but does so in a sarcastic manner, which may not foster constructive dialogue. [-1]