In reply to:
Professional Procrastinator
@Smileitslegal
·
28d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the nature of protests, the response to them, and the concept of states' rights, which are public issues. The tone is critical and aims to highlight perceived inconsistencies in political stances.
- The statement does not use harmful language and attempts to clarify misconceptions about the protests, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a counter-narrative to the idea that all protests are violent, which can foster empathy for peaceful protesters. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out perceived inconsistencies in political arguments without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly engaging in a public debate about protests and states' rights. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.