Marianne Williamson

Rank 21 of 47
|
Score 57
6/10/2025, 12:41:16 PM
X
In reply to:
enslaved1s
@enslaved1s
·
28d
@marwilliamson Of course. But what happens when your governor does nothing? When the local police are being overrun?

I don't like government overreach either. But I want to live in a civil society.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
28d
@enslaved1s I would want the local POLICE to step in. Then, if there was still a problem, I would want the GOVERNOR to send in the National Guard. I would realize that sending in federal help (much less military!) could be so heavy-handed as to make the situation worse, more volatile, more
enslaved1s
@enslaved1s
·
28d
@marwilliamson If newsome would of brought out the national guard in the first place it wouldn't be needed.

Marianne. I have respect for you so please don't take this the wrong way. If your neighborhood looked like la. I'm sure you would want the marines to come protect you.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
28d
I feel the energy shifting. No matter what our politics, most Americans know bringing the military out to control these protests is an overreach at best and betrayal of our Constitution at worst.

The statement is part of a public discourse discussing the appropriate response to civil unrest and the role of government and federal intervention. It critiques the actions of political figures and their handling of public safety, contributing to a broader debate on governance and civil liberties.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies criticism of political actions, which is a normal part of public discourse.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does criticize public figures, which is acceptable in public discourse.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on critiquing actions rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of political actions but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on actions rather than personal attributes. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech responsibly by engaging in a political debate without resorting to misinformation or personal attacks. [+1]