The statement is part of a public discourse on the interpretation of AI research and its implications, engaging in a critique of how a specific graph from a paper is being interpreted in the context of AI development.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not cause harm but expresses disagreement with interpretations, which is a normal part of academic discourse.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does engage in a critique that could lead to a better understanding of the research.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the interpretation of the graph rather than attacking individuals.
[+1]