Gary Marcus

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 69
6/16/2025, 1:44:12 PM
X
In reply to:
Driver License
@galerkin_method
·
68d
@GaryMarcus someone should create 'inverse gary marcus' ETF
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
68d
people lie about me and distort my views all the time. this is a good example.

This is dishonest, full of distortions and incorrect.
1. I predicted specifically that pretraining scaling would run out and that we would need new innovations. it did and we have and still do. I
VraserX e/acc
@VraserX
·
68d
Gary Marcus has spent the last 5 years confidently predicting things that aged worse than milk in the sun.
🧢 “Scaling laws don’t work”
🧢 “GPT-4 is the end”
🧢 “Deep learning hit a wall”
🧢 “LLMs will never understand meaning”

Meanwhile, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, xAI and

The statement is part of a broader discussion about AI predictions and critiques of Gary Marcus's views. It uses sarcasm and humor to comment on the financial implications of AI developments, specifically GPT-5, in contrast to previous predictions. The tone is informal and somewhat mocking, contributing to a debate on AI progress and predictions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses humor and sarcasm, which might not directly harm but could contribute to a dismissive tone. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment but could be seen as disrespectful to the individual being discussed. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The use of sarcasm does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on mocking a prediction. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for sarcasm instead of a reasoned argument. [-1]