Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47

Score 116

@llmvibes @sama unless we solve the problems of distribution shift that i pointed out nearly 30 years ago, we will never get to AGI.

unless we follow the path towards neurosymbolic AI I laid down, we will never get to AGI.

science isn’t a popularity contest.

6/16/2025, 10:06:50 PM

In reply to:

Patrick

@llmvibes

31d

@GaryMarcus Hi Gary,

Serious question.

Who has contributed more to AI, @garymarcus or @sama?

Have a nice day.

Best regards,
Patrick

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

31d

For those alleging I am often wrong, here’s what I actually predicted (December, 2022). Bang on, whether you like it or not.

Two and a half years later: Still no GPT-5. And not one of the problems I pointed has been solved in a stable, enduring, principled way.

The statement engages in a technical discussion about the future of AI, specifically addressing the challenges of achieving AGI and the importance of neurosymbolic AI. It critiques the current state of AI development and emphasizes the need for scientific rigor over popularity.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not cause harm but rather focuses on scientific discourse. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by discussing specific AI challenges and solutions. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement critiques current AI approaches without engaging in personal attacks. [+1]