Gary Marcus

Rank 10 of 47

Score 116

For those alleging I am often wrong, here’s what I actually predicted (December, 2022). Bang on, whether you like it or not.

Two and a half years later: Still no GPT-5. And not one of the problems I pointed has been solved in a stable, enduring, principled way.

6/16/2025, 9:50:46 PM

The statement reflects a critical analysis of AI developments, specifically regarding GPT-4 and its limitations. The tone is assertive and somewhat defensive, aiming to validate past predictions about AI's progress and challenges.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language to emphasize points, which could be perceived as confrontational.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by providing detailed insights into AI limitations, fostering awareness of ongoing challenges. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI technologies, focusing on technical shortcomings rather than personal attacks. [+1]