Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement criticizes WPATH and questions the ability of children to consent to medical treatments related to gender transition. It uses strong language, referring to the practices as 'barbarism,' which indicates a highly critical tone. The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a contentious issue related to medical ethics and children's rights.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of those involved, particularly by labeling medical practices as 'barbarism,' which could be seen as disrespectful. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and instead uses a confrontational tone, which may hinder understanding and empathy. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.