In reply to:
Erin Friday, Esq.
@ErinFriday75490
·
10d
The statement is a supportive reply to a critical comment about WPATH and its guidelines on informed consent for sex-transition treatments in children. The original comment questions the ability of children to understand long-term consequences and criticizes WPATH's role in medical guidelines. The reply uses emojis to express agreement and enthusiasm.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but supports a critical stance on a sensitive issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment but is part of a conversation that could be seen as critical of a group. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it aligns with a critical viewpoint without offering constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but supports a critical opinion without constructive criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.