Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47

Score -197

-8

Allowing surgeons to operate on the healthy bodies of children in an effort to change their gender is liberation, say the media. It’s not. It’s barbarism. In fact, it’s one of the worst medical scandals in history.

Happily the Supreme Court has upheld the right of states to ban

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

481d

THE WPATH FILES

Advocates of gender-affirming care say it’s evidence-based.

But now, newly released internal files from the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) prove that the practice of transgender medicine is neither scientific nor medical.

American

6/18/2025, 6:33:47 PM

The statement presents a strong opinion against gender-affirming surgeries for children, labeling it as 'barbarism' and a 'medical scandal.' It references a Supreme Court decision and critiques media portrayal, suggesting a significant societal issue. The tone is critical and confrontational.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, potentially stigmatizing individuals involved in gender-affirming care. [-2]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The language used may not respect the dignity of those who support or undergo gender-affirming care, potentially contributing to harassment or hate speech. [-2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead taking a divisive stance. [-2]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for a confrontational approach without acknowledging opposing views. [-2]