Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a public discourse as it engages with public issues related to transparency and accountability in the tech industry, specifically concerning OpenAI and its leadership. The tone is critical and defensive, as the speaker addresses accusations of mendacity against a public figure and defends their own actions in reporting these issues.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a negative perception of the individual mentioned.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement respects privacy by not disclosing private information but could be seen as engaging in public criticism. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
5. Principle 5:

   I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.

   There is no acknowledgment of mistakes in the statement.
6. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to highlight issues of public concern, potentially contributing to societal betterment. [+1]
7. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to address public issues responsibly. [+1]