Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement is a skeptical response to a discussion about AI safety and AGI timelines, suggesting that a proposed solution may not work reliably. The tone is informal and dismissive, indicating doubt about the effectiveness of the solution.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the potential effectiveness of a solution without detailed reasoning.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy or constructive engagement, as it dismisses the idea without offering alternatives or understanding. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it provides a negative opinion without supporting arguments. [-1]