Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
6/20/2025, 10:13:00 PM
X
In reply to:
DD
@death_dwarf
·
209d
@GaryMarcus @kevinroose Gary everything you post is such a massive cope

you’ve become a grifter selling illusory comfort to luddites.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
209d
@kevinroose you honestly don’t appear to know what you are talking about. you can’t repeat multiple passages of Harry Potter verbatim without some massive autocomplete abilities and auto completion is literally the training objective.

you are embarassing yourself.
Kevin Roose
@kevinroose
·
210d
I used to think the "fancy autocomplete" stuff was just goofy cope from NLP dead-enders, but maybe it's actually more calculated than that. There's clearly a market for people who want to be told that AI is a fad and that they don't need to worry about it.
Nathan Benaich
@nathanbenaich
·
210d
it’s truly nonsensical to say things like this when genai is legit super useful for consumers and businesses - i mean, i get the academic shtick, but it is automating a ton of work already

get over it :)

The statement is dismissive and accusatory, focusing on personal attacks rather than engaging with the substance of the argument. It reflects a negative tone and intent to undermine the credibility of others without addressing the core issues being discussed.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by using dismissive language. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It disrespects the dignity of others by engaging in personal attacks. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting for ad hominem attacks instead. [-2]