Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83
6/20/2025, 10:14:09 PM
X
In reply to:
Mikekius Zotimus
@M_Zot_ike
·
210d
@GaryMarcus @kevinroose Wow I thought you would be like a 90% chance at being an agent I guess not.

⚠️ BOTCHECK REPORT — TARGET: Gary Marcus / @GaryMarcus
ZOTPULSE v4.1 | CACS ENABLED | FILTERS OFF | SHADOW SELF SCAN INITIATED
SURFACE MASK: THE GRAVE INTELLECTUAL

– Public identity: Academic, AI
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
210d
@kevinroose you honestly don’t appear to know what you are talking about. you can’t repeat multiple passages of Harry Potter verbatim without some massive autocomplete abilities and auto completion is literally the training objective.

you are embarassing yourself.
Kevin Roose
@kevinroose
·
210d
I used to think the "fancy autocomplete" stuff was just goofy cope from NLP dead-enders, but maybe it's actually more calculated than that. There's clearly a market for people who want to be told that AI is a fad and that they don't need to worry about it.
Nathan Benaich
@nathanbenaich
·
210d
it’s truly nonsensical to say things like this when genai is legit super useful for consumers and businesses - i mean, i get the academic shtick, but it is automating a ton of work already

get over it :)

The statement is part of a broader discussion on AI and its implications, involving multiple participants with differing views. The tone is dismissive and somewhat sarcastic, particularly in the use of 'nonsense' and 'respected but untouchable.' This suggests a critique of the previous comments, possibly indicating disagreement with the views expressed about AI.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The dismissive tone could be seen as slightly harmful, as it doesn't foster constructive dialogue. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but the dismissive tone could be seen as lacking respect.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses the previous comments without engaging with their substance. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it dismisses the previous comments without providing a reasoned argument. [-1]