The statement critiques the overconfidence in the autonomous vehicle (AV) industry, highlighting past claims about the technology's readiness. It reflects skepticism about the industry's promises and suggests a lack of sympathy for its challenges due to previous exaggerated claims.
- The statement does not directly harm but critiques past industry behavior, which could be seen as holding the industry accountable.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by pointing out the discrepancy between past claims and current realities, encouraging a more realistic view of AV technology. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the industry's past behavior without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.