Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 83

The statement critiques the influence of online communities on public discourse, suggesting that they promote unrealistic ideas about the future. It implies a concern for the quality of public dialogue and the impact of these discussions on societal understanding.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly harm others but critiques a broader trend, maintaining a neutral tone.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting a perceived issue in public discourse, though it could be more empathetic.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of a trend rather than attacking individuals, adhering to this principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By critiquing the influence of online discourse, the statement seeks to use influence for societal betterment. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing public discourse trends. [+1]