Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64

The statement questions the correlation between wealth and intellectual openness, implying skepticism about the assumption that wealth equates to intellectual openness. It seems to be a light critique or observation rather than a substantive engagement with a public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm but rather presents a critical observation.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is more of a critique.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in mild criticism without personal attacks. [+1]