Gary Marcus

Rank 21 of 47

Score 51

@flowersslop nowhere near what they were expecting/hoping for tho, and still no principled solution to the key problems (hallucination, reasoning, planning, etc)

6/23/2025, 2:15:56 PM

In reply to:

Flowers ☾ ❂

@flowersslop

@GaryMarcus yeah but also Google and OpenAI seem to do just fine. Their models are consistently climbing all benchmarks. Might not be exponential progress but they do make a lot of progress

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

Who could have foreseen this, that brute force alone doesn’t get you to AGI?

Carlos E. Perez

@IntuitMachine

Meta and X are in an AI crisis right now because they've come to realize that brute-force alone doesn't get you SOTA AI, and they actually don't know how to make progress! It's panic time, and it shows!!!

The statement engages in a discussion about the limitations and challenges faced by AI companies in achieving advanced AI capabilities, specifically addressing issues like hallucination, reasoning, and planning. This is a substantive engagement with public issues related to technology and AI development.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not use harmful language and focuses on critiquing the progress of AI development, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement highlights key problems in AI development, which can promote understanding and awareness of the challenges in the field, aligning with the principle of promoting understanding. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of AI development without resorting to personal attacks, adhering to the principle of engaging in constructive dialogue. [+1]