In reply to:
Recursifist
@recursifist
·
10d
Machine Learning Street Talk
@MLStreetTalk
·
10d
The statement is part of a conversation about AI, specifically discussing topics like AI autonomy and 'spiky superintelligence.' It reflects on the limitations of a discussion or event, indicating that certain topics were not covered due to time constraints. The tone is inquisitive and reflective, seeking clarification on a specific term.
- The statement does no harm and is part of a constructive dialogue about AI. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding by seeking clarification on a complex topic. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- Engages in constructive dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.