The statement critiques the trend of 'vibe coding' and compares it to the crypto boom, suggesting that many people are engaging in it without proper understanding. It mentions prominent individuals like @kevinroose, implying that their promotion may have contributed to the hype. The tone is critical and aims to highlight a perceived lack of knowledge among those involved in vibe coding.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but criticizes a trend and those involved in it. It could be seen as indirectly harmful if it discourages people from learning or engaging with new technologies. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does call out individuals and groups, which could be seen as disrespectful if not done constructively. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism. It makes a broad critique without offering solutions or engaging with those it criticizes. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.