Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84
6/27/2025, 2:15:01 AM
X
In reply to:
Wyatt Walls
@lefthanddraft
·
226d
@GaryMarcus Ok, so then I don't get how get from:
1. it's possible to fine-tune GPT4o to make it say offensive things
to
2. pull ChatGPT from the market

Consumers don't encounter finetunes through the ChatGPT product. They could jailbreak it, but that's user misuse
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
226d
@lefthanddraft yes it is from that paper
Wyatt Walls
@lefthanddraft
·
226d
@GaryMarcus How does this relate to the consumer ChatGPT product?

I don't have access to the full article, but if this is about Emergent Misalignment, that paper is about finetuning GPT-4o not the consumer ChatGPT product.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
226d
Vile.

ChatGPT should be pulled from the market til they fix this.

The statement addresses concerns about the vulnerabilities and safety of AI models, specifically regarding fine-tuning and potential misuse. It highlights the inadequacy of current guardrails in AI systems, suggesting a need for better safety measures.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by AI vulnerabilities, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on systemic issues rather than targeting individuals. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by discussing the technical aspects of AI safety and vulnerabilities. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By raising awareness about AI safety, the statement uses influence for societal betterment. [+1]