Gary Marcus

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 84

The statement engages in a discussion about the development of artificial general intelligence (AGI) and the influence of financial interests and expertise on understanding its timelines. It critiques the perspectives of those with financial conflicts of interest, suggesting that true understanding comes from those without such biases.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies that those with financial interests may be misleading, which could be seen as indirectly harmful. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does question the integrity of certain individuals, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it dismisses the views of those with financial interests without engaging with their arguments. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it dismisses opposing views without addressing them directly, which could be seen as a form of ad hominem argument. [-1]
  5. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement does not acknowledge or correct any mistakes, as it is a critique rather than a reflection on past statements.
  6. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement does not explicitly use influence for societal betterment, as it focuses on critiquing others rather than proposing solutions.
  7. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion, but it could use the platform more responsibly by engaging in constructive dialogue.