Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
10d
The statement expresses concern over Brazil's alleged censorship measures, comparing them to China's, and calls for action from U.S. political figures. It uses strong language to emphasize urgency and potential threats to free speech.
- The statement uses alarmist language, which may incite fear rather than promote understanding, slightly violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It accuses specific individuals of criminal behavior without evidence, potentially violating their privacy and dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote empathy or compassion, focusing instead on fear and urgency. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, opting for a confrontational approach. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The call for action from influential figures suggests an attempt to use influence for societal change, but the approach may not be responsible.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by criticizing censorship but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.