In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
10d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
10d
The statement suggests a strong political action in response to Brazil's alleged censorship measures, reflecting a serious tone and intent to influence U.S. foreign policy. It engages in public discourse by addressing international relations and human rights issues.
- The statement calls for action that could be seen as protective of free speech, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by opposing censorship. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy but could be seen as aggressive towards Brazilian officials, potentially bordering on harassment. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on punitive measures without engaging in discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- It uses influence to advocate for policy change, aiming to address perceived human rights violations. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.