Gary Marcus

The statement is part of a public discourse on the technological competition between China and the U.S., specifically regarding access to chips and its implications for the development of large language models (LLMs). The tone is speculative and suggests that China will find ways to overcome current limitations.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but implies illegal activities like smuggling, which could be seen as harmful. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad assumption about a nation's actions.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on competitive and potentially illegal actions. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it does not address the underlying issues or offer solutions. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement uses free speech to speculate on international actions but does not do so with a responsible or constructive approach. [-1]