In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
13d
The statement and images engage in public discourse by discussing global censorship and political events. The tone is critical and suggests a conspiracy involving censorship efforts by various governments and institutions.
- The statement may cause harm by promoting a narrative of conspiracy without clear evidence, potentially inciting fear or distrust. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It could violate privacy and dignity by implicating individuals and institutions in a negative light without substantiated claims. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and instead focuses on personal attacks and ad hominem arguments against specific figures and institutions. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.