Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -202

The statement critiques a political figure's alleged agenda, using charged language like 'openly racist' and 'gaslighting.' It questions the integrity of the candidate's statements and intentions.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The accusation of racism and gaslighting could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting dignity. [-2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue and uses personal attacks, violating the principle of constructive criticism. [-2]