Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47

Score 64

@NathanpmYoung Supervised FSD ≠ driving genuinely unassisted, and the intervention rates as far as I understand them are orders of magnitude worse than Waymo.

It’s not something you can tell in a single ride.

6/29/2025, 7:25:55 PM

In reply to:

Nathan 🔎

@NathanpmYoung

@GaryMarcus Have you been in a tesla that uses supervised FSD. They are really good.

Maybe waymos are better (maybe) but Teslas are really good.

I think this kind of tweet seems to be a mistaken view of reality.

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

Better not let Tesla robotaxis use this sort of sorcery!

Jay Anderson

@TheProjectUnity

🚨LIDAR Scans reveal the incredible precision and scale of the ancient pyramid site of Teotihuacan, Mexico

The statement engages in a discussion about the effectiveness and safety of Tesla's Full Self-Driving (FSD) technology compared to Waymo, which is a public issue related to technology and safety. The tone is analytical and aims to provide a counterpoint to a previous claim about Tesla's capabilities.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on factual information and analysis rather than personal attacks. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
It promotes understanding by providing a perspective on the limitations of Tesla's FSD technology, encouraging informed discussion. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the technology's performance without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]