Gary Marcus

Rank 19 of 47
|
Score 64
6/30/2025, 2:42:52 PM
X
In reply to:
Deborah LaRue
@DeborahLaRue11
·
3d
@GaryMarcus This is as at today. But one year from now?
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
4d
BREAKING: “LLM ideas result in worse project than human ideas”
CLS
@ChengleiSi
·
4d
Are AI scientists already better than human researchers?

We recruited 43 PhD students to spend 3 months executing research ideas proposed by an LLM agent vs human experts.

Main finding: LLM ideas result in worse projects than human ideas.

The statement involves a public discourse on the effectiveness of LLM-generated ideas compared to human ideas, referencing a study. The tone is assertive, with a challenge implied by the $1M bet, suggesting confidence in a particular outcome. The intent is to engage in a debate about AI capabilities.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as provocative due to the bet, which might escalate tensions.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on a monetary challenge rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a bet to make a point rather than discussing the study's findings. [-1]