Gary Marcus

Rank 20 of 47
|
Score 53
6/30/2025, 6:52:43 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
7h
@EdmundKudzayi @DarioAmodei @ChengleiSi this is separate, addressing a specific, separate claim.

(also you have somewhat confused the other million dollar offer, which was never specifically about the 10k lines; that was a different bet that i would still probably take.)
Edmund Kudzayi
@EdmundKudzayi
·
7h
@GaryMarcus @DarioAmodei @ChengleiSi I see you’ve dropped the 10,000 lines of code once linked to your million-dollar offer. Why? That question alone exposes why these grand pronouncements are ultimately pointless. The issues raised are irrelevant to the immediate remarkable utility; so much so that what seemed
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
11h
🎺 I am hereby publicly offering to bet @darioamodei $1,000,000 that AI in 2027 will NOT be “smarter than Nobel Prize winners across most fields in science and engineering”. 🎺

Why? We are nowhere close. Consider:

• New Stanford study from @ChengleiSi shows that “LLM ideas

The statement is a clarification in a debate about a public bet regarding AI capabilities. It addresses a factual inaccuracy about the terms of a previous offer, aiming to correct the record.

  1. Principle 5:
    I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
    The statement acknowledges a mistake or misunderstanding in the previous discourse and seeks to correct it, which aligns with the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes. [+1]