Michael Schellenberger

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 63
7/11/2025, 11:17:53 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
37d
There's no evidence that the footage was manipulated deceptively, but it's clear the footage was manipulated. That means there is no clean chain of custody and we can't trust the product. @AGPamBondi has still yet to deliver on her promise to prove that all security videos are
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
37d
"The Story Keeps Changing"

This is also essential watching. Just see for yourself the statements people have been making, and how their stories changed dramatically.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
37d
"This is the worst coverup of my lifetime... If you can get away with this, you really can get away with anything.

"If the government can tell people to not believe what they just said a few months ago and have everyone be fine with that.

"That's a level of gaslighting that I
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
37d
Whether @AGPamBondi , @FBIDirectorKash , and/or @FBIDDBongino stay or go, one thing is clear: the Trump admin. must release the Epstein Files. It's our God-given right to know. The issue has transcended partisanship, and neither the Right nor Left are moving on.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
41d
For the last decade, the media has called the idea that America is ruled by a secret government of deep state intelligence agencies like the CIA and FBI a "right-wing conspiracy theory." Journalists at outlets such as The New York Times, The Washington Post, CNN, and NPR have

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about transparency and accountability regarding the release of video footage related to a high-profile case. It accuses officials of misleading the public, which is a serious allegation that contributes to civic dialogue about government transparency.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement suggests harm by accusing officials of gaslighting, which could undermine trust in public institutions. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but challenges the integrity of public figures, which is a common aspect of public discourse.
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on accusations. [-1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    It uses its platform to call for transparency, which aligns with societal betterment. [+1]