Michael Schellenberger

Rank 17 of 47
|
Score 63
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
37d

The statement is part of a broader discussion about the transparency and integrity of video evidence related to a high-profile case. It questions the authenticity of the released footage and suggests that the public is being misled, which is a significant public issue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by suggesting the public is being gaslighted, which could undermine trust in public institutions.聽[-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but challenges the integrity of public figures, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting discrepancies in the information provided to the public.聽[+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of public figures and institutions but does not resort to personal attacks.聽[+1]