Gary Marcus

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of artificial general intelligence (AGI) development and comparing it to the historical context of biological weapons, suggesting that international agreements can prevent harmful technological advancements.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not use harmful language and instead references a historical precedent to suggest a peaceful resolution, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   By drawing a parallel with the Biological Weapons Convention, the statement promotes understanding and suggests a path towards empathy and compassion in handling AGI development. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a historical analogy rather than attacking the previous speaker, aligning with the principle of constructive criticism. [+1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses the speaker's influence to suggest a positive societal outcome by referencing a successful international treaty, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement responsibly uses free speech to contribute to a critical discussion on AGI, aligning with the principle of responsible platform use. [+1]