Gary Marcus

Rank 18 of 47
|
Score 72

The statement by @MarioBnyc, 'addressed elsewhere (many times),' in response to a conversation about AI safety and existential risks, constitutes public discourse. It engages with a public issue concerning AI development and safety, which is a significant societal concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but dismisses the concern without engaging substantively, which could be seen as a minor violation of striving to do no harm by potentially downplaying serious issues. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion as it dismisses the concern without providing further insight or constructive dialogue. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It dismisses the concern without addressing the substance of the argument, which could be seen as a minor violation of engaging in meaningful discourse. [-1]