The statement expresses skepticism and criticism towards the AI industry's delayed recognition of AI interpretability issues. It highlights a perceived arrogance in the industry and suggests that warnings were ignored. The tone is sarcastic and critical.
- The statement could be seen as potentially harmful by dismissing the efforts of researchers, though it raises a valid concern about AI interpretability. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on past warnings and perceived arrogance. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.