Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 94
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
69d
this is hilarious. like they just woke up and discovered that black boxes are uninterpretable.

in reality this was always going to happen, and something many of us warned about for years.

arrogance is what has gotten us to this point.
7/20/2025, 4:17:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
69d
@zjasper666 @kimmonismus nobody has ever fully understood LLMs.
Jasper
@zjasper666
路
69d
@kimmonismus big labs people also want to understand AI better 馃 @GaryMarcus
Chubby鈾笍
@kimmonismus
路
69d
Scientists from OpenAl, Google DeepMind, Anthropic and Meta have abandoned their fierce corporate rivalry to issue a joint warning about Al safety. More than 40 researchers published a research paper today arguing that a brief window to monitor Al reasoning could close forever -

The conversation involves a discussion on AI safety and the interpretability of large language models (LLMs), which is a significant public issue. The tone is somewhat critical and sarcastic, particularly in Gary Marcus's response, which highlights a perceived lack of foresight by major AI labs. The discussion touches on the need for understanding AI systems better and the potential risks involved.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement by Gary Marcus is critical but does not directly cause harm. It highlights a concern about AI interpretability.
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation promotes awareness of AI safety issues, which can foster understanding and empathy for the complexities involved.聽[+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The tone is sarcastic and somewhat dismissive, which may not fully engage in constructive dialogue.聽[-1]