Gary Marcus

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 94
7/20/2025, 4:23:33 PM
X
In reply to:
Иван Л.
@govori_proshe
·
69d
@theiyobosa @GaryMarcus Such a luck that Gary offered one long ago and it’s not yet close.
Iyobosa Evbayowieru
@theiyobosa
·
69d
@GaryMarcus I think what many are saying is that, decades ago, people would easily agree that what we have now is AGI. Now, we’re here, it’s still very difficult to agree that what we have is AGI, more like we’re shifting the goal posts daily. I think what we need is a definition for AGI.
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
69d
Desperately need a name for the fallacy of thinking that a single “impressive” result entails AGI, given how many people here committed that error in the last 24 hours.
Wes Roth
@WesRothMoney
·
70d
AGI achieved!

This was considered by many to be the most impossible AGI standard to achieve.

Congrats to the OpenAI team, I never thought I'd see the day.

The statement engages in a discussion about the criteria for AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) and references a past essay for context. It implies a shift in standards due to financial influences, suggesting a critique of how AGI is defined and recognized. The tone is critical and reflective, aiming to contribute to the debate on AGI definitions and standards.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and contributes to a broader discussion on AGI. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding by referencing past criteria and suggesting a shift in standards. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    Engages in constructive criticism by questioning the influence of money on AGI criteria. [+1]