The statement and image discuss OpenAI's decision to announce results before the closing ceremony of the IMO, despite a request to wait. The tone is critical, suggesting that OpenAI's actions were inconsiderate and self-serving. The content raises concerns about respect for the event and its participants.
- The statement suggests that OpenAI's actions may have caused harm by overshadowing the achievements of the IMO participants. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of the IMO participants by highlighting the importance of focusing on their achievements. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by explaining the rationale behind the request to delay announcements. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the issue without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.