The statement critiques OpenAI's conduct in relation to the IMO, contrasting it with DeepMind's approach. It implies that DeepMind's methods are more efficient and sportsmanlike, while OpenAI's actions are seen as inconsiderate for announcing results prematurely.
- The statement indirectly suggests harm by criticizing OpenAI's conduct, potentially affecting their reputation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but criticizes OpenAI's actions, which could be seen as a form of public shaming. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of OpenAI, but it lacks constructive dialogue and leans towards a personal attack on their conduct. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.