Gary Marcus

Rank 12 of 47

Score 110

-1

@lethal_ai @liron @DoomDebates in despise this almost enough to block you. here is why - people keep making this accusation and never point to any concrete evidence when i ask. never.

7/20/2025, 6:44:41 PM

In reply to:

lethalintelligence.ai

@lethal_ai

67d

My first thoughts on the “Gary Marcus” test:
(btw @GaryMarcus is great, especially enjoyed the @liron @DoomDebates episode, but I guess I’m just more of a techno-optimist at heart)

Gary Marcus

@GaryMarcus

67d

The “Marcus Test” for AGI (I didn’t name it that, but it means “no AGI til Marcus says it’s AGI”) is a pretty good test for AGI.* But don’t bullshit yourself about what it is.

• It’s not about achieving a single result—I have used the word impressive (or similar) to describe

The statement expresses frustration over repeated accusations without evidence, indicating a desire for accountability and clarity in discussions about AGI. The tone is defensive and somewhat confrontational.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to address a perceived issue of baseless accusations, which aligns with striving to do no harm by seeking truth and evidence. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
The confrontational tone and mention of blocking could be seen as dismissive, potentially impacting the dignity of others involved. [-1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it focuses on frustration rather than fostering understanding or resolution. [-1]