Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement expresses strong criticism of OpenAI and its leadership for allegedly prioritizing their achievements over the recognition of young participants in a competition. The tone is accusatory and uses charged language, suggesting unethical behavior by OpenAI. The intent appears to be to call out perceived misconduct and advocate for fair recognition of the students' efforts.
- The statement violates the principle of doing no harm with words by using harsh and accusatory language. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it engages in public shaming and potentially defamatory remarks. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it resorts to personal attacks rather than addressing the issue diplomatically. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.