In reply to:
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
路
65d
The statement 'partial but only partial exoneration' seems to address the issue of OpenAI's actions in relation to the IMO's request. It suggests that while there may be some justification or understanding of OpenAI's actions, it does not fully absolve them of responsibility. The conversation revolves around the ethical considerations of AI companies respecting the achievements of human participants in the IMO by not overshadowing them with announcements.
- The statement acknowledges the complexity of the situation, suggesting a nuanced view that avoids outright condemnation, aligning with the principle of doing no harm.聽[+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By discussing the appropriateness of OpenAI's actions, the statement respects the privacy and dignity of the human participants, aligning with this principle.聽[+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by recognizing the partial nature of the exoneration, encouraging a balanced view.聽[+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by acknowledging both sides of the issue without resorting to personal attacks.聽[+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.