The statement suggests that OpenAI acted differently from expected norms, causing dissatisfaction. It implies a critique of OpenAI's actions in a public setting, possibly related to a competition or event. The context involves a discussion about a mathematical model and its representation at a prestigious competition.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting OpenAI's actions upset many people, but it lacks specific details to assess the extent of harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement criticizes OpenAI's actions but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.