Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
177d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
10d
The statement expresses a strong negative opinion about digital IDs and accuses a public figure of being controlled by external influences. It uses inflammatory language, suggesting a conspiracy and labeling individuals as 'sick in the head.'
- The statement uses harmful language, potentially inciting fear and distrust without evidence, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It disrespects the privacy and dignity of individuals by making personal attacks and unfounded accusations, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division and suspicion. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.