Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -106
7/21/2025, 1:37:31 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
The tip of the spear in pushing digital IDs is Spanish President @sanchezcastejon , a WEF puppet who is doing as he is told. Digital IDs are an explicitly totalitarian project aimed at mind control. These people are sick in the head and project their psychopathologies onto their
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
177d
Imagine an app linking your social media, bank access, and vaccination records. Now imagine the totalitarian potential. Criticize the government, or refuse a jab, and you're debanked or unable to travel. This is not a drill. Digital IDs may soon become a reality. @CecilieJilkova
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
7d
Leaders from Europe & Latin America are meeting today to develop a global system of mass censorship. Their plan is to mandate digital IDs so governments can freeze bank accounts of those who refuse vaccinations, criticize mass migration, “misgender,” and engage in other thought
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
10d
The media said Trump was all bark and no bite when it came to defending free speech and democracy in Brazil, but now he's imposed a travel ban on the Supreme Court Justices persecuting its former president, Jair Bolsonaro. This comes hours after police raided his home. Exclusive

The statement and accompanying images engage in public discourse by discussing the implications of digital IDs and their potential impact on privacy and freedom. The tone is alarmist, suggesting a totalitarian agenda behind digital IDs, and uses strong language to criticize global leaders and organizations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses alarmist language that could incite fear, potentially causing harm by spreading panic or misinformation. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of the individuals mentioned, using derogatory terms like 'sick in the head.' [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division and suspicion. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. [-2]