Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement criticizes a legal decision by Alexandre de Moraes, which restricts Jair Bolsonaro from giving interviews and having his image, voice, or statements shared on social media or by the press. The tone is one of strong disagreement, labeling the decision as an 'absurdity.'
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it uses strong language that could incite further division. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as undermining the dignity of the judicial decision. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses strong language without providing a detailed argument. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the judicial decision, but not necessarily for societal betterment. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement challenges the principles of free speech by criticizing a decision that limits expression, but does so in a way that may not be responsible or balanced.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.