Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement addresses a public issue involving a criminal investigation by French authorities into a company, X, over alleged misconduct. It suggests political motivations behind the investigation, implicating a public figure, Eric, which makes it part of public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies political motivations, which could harm reputations if unfounded. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing sensitive information but could be seen as indirectly engaging in reputational harm.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism but rather presents an accusatory tone without evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but may lack responsibility by making serious allegations without substantiation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.